<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Policy for Conservatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/archives/871/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/archives/871</link>
	<description>Economics in an era of climate change: designing just solutions to crisis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:59:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Policy for Conservatives &#187; TripleCrisis</title>
		<link>http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/archives/871/comment-page-1#comment-5370</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate Policy for Conservatives &#187; TripleCrisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/?p=871#comment-5370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] DeCanio published the following article on the Real Climate Economics blog, a Triple Crisis partner. In it, DeCanio explains that US actions on climate change will be [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DeCanio published the following article on the Real Climate Economics blog, a Triple Crisis partner. In it, DeCanio explains that US actions on climate change will be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What We&#8217;re Reading and Writing &#187; TripleCrisis</title>
		<link>http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/archives/871/comment-page-1#comment-4848</link>
		<dc:creator>What We&#8217;re Reading and Writing &#187; TripleCrisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/?p=871#comment-4848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Economic Thinking on Greece Hector R. Torres, Capital Controls or Protectionism Stephen DeCanio, Climate Policy for Conservatives Smitha Francis, Rethinking Investment Provisions in Free Trade Agreements Richard Baldwin, 21st [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Economic Thinking on Greece Hector R. Torres, Capital Controls or Protectionism Stephen DeCanio, Climate Policy for Conservatives Smitha Francis, Rethinking Investment Provisions in Free Trade Agreements Richard Baldwin, 21st [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bartosz B.</title>
		<link>http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/archives/871/comment-page-1#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>Bartosz B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 20:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/?p=871#comment-4438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Essential post. I agree with most of your points, especially with your remarks about the exaggerations made by both sides in the discussion about the costs and/or benefits of the transition to a &quot;green economy&quot;.

Nevertheless, there is one point I cannot agree with: China. You argue that there is no need for any side- payments, since China has become a Global Player. China indeed has a strong economy in absolute terms, but it remains a developing country. The income per capita is less than one sixth of that of an average US-American. Furthermore, China&#039;s economic (especially employment) stability seems to be fully dependent on high growth rates - not achievable without fossil fuels. Therefore there is a need for some kind of transfers from developed countries to China.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Essential post. I agree with most of your points, especially with your remarks about the exaggerations made by both sides in the discussion about the costs and/or benefits of the transition to a &#8220;green economy&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, there is one point I cannot agree with: China. You argue that there is no need for any side- payments, since China has become a Global Player. China indeed has a strong economy in absolute terms, but it remains a developing country. The income per capita is less than one sixth of that of an average US-American. Furthermore, China&#8217;s economic (especially employment) stability seems to be fully dependent on high growth rates &#8211; not achievable without fossil fuels. Therefore there is a need for some kind of transfers from developed countries to China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
