<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bipartisan Climate Bill in Partisan Times?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/archives/108/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/archives/108</link>
	<description>Economics in an era of climate change: designing just solutions to crisis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 13:20:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Johnson</title>
		<link>http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/archives/108/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/?p=108#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Is the point of this blog to be realistic about economics but unrealistic about politics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the point of this blog to be realistic about economics but unrealistic about politics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Maher</title>
		<link>http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/archives/108/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realclimateeconomics.org/wp/?p=108#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I really like how simple the CLEAR Act is...basically just a giant economy-wide Cap.
However, the initial delay in emission reductions goes against everything that the latest science tells us that we need to do.  The Collins/Cantwell bill adheres to the more traditional (and outdated) economic view that climate change mitigation should start slowly and pick up speed as we move further into the future...the science tells us that this is a bad idea.  

For a brief analysis comparing the different emission-reduction targets of proposals in Congress, check out this WRI report:
http://pdf.wri.org/usclimatetargets_2010-06-08.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like how simple the CLEAR Act is&#8230;basically just a giant economy-wide Cap.<br />
However, the initial delay in emission reductions goes against everything that the latest science tells us that we need to do.  The Collins/Cantwell bill adheres to the more traditional (and outdated) economic view that climate change mitigation should start slowly and pick up speed as we move further into the future&#8230;the science tells us that this is a bad idea.  </p>
<p>For a brief analysis comparing the different emission-reduction targets of proposals in Congress, check out this WRI report:<br />
<a href="http://pdf.wri.org/usclimatetargets_2010-06-08.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://pdf.wri.org/usclimatetargets_2010-06-08.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

